eHarmony Communication - Revisited

As I mentioned in yesterday's article... the process of getting to know someone online should be fun.

However, as it stands, eHarmony's guided communication process... isn't.

Here's how I'd go about changing it.

Phase 1: Change "Closed Ended Questions" to, "Interested?"

eHarmony's "guided communication" starts with the process of asking "Closed ended" (multiple-choice) questions from a list.

And, unless you're prone to asking stupid questions, or giving stupid answers... it's a pretty benign beginning. A nice way for the timid to break the ice.

But, the questions are rarely useful. So, why not get rid of 'em?

Make "Phase One" simple. Have someone initiate.

Once initiated, the other person gets a notification. Only, instead of three stupid questions, they get one important one.

"_____ has read your profile, and is interested in talking with you. (Profile is displayed) Would you like to:

A) Talk further
B) Politely decline
C) Think about it."

Why make it more complicated than that?

They answered A? The ice is broken. Move on.

Must Haves/Can't Stands - A good idea, poorly executed

In the next phase of guided communication, couples are required to create a list of ten "Must Haves" and "Can't stands" from a multiple choice list.

And, during "Phase two" of guided communication, they are required to share those lists with each other.

I'll give credit to Dr. Warren on this one - the "Must Haves/Can't Stands" list isn't a bad idea. It's easy for someone to get caught up in the highs of early relationshiphood, and fail to realize that a relationship will, ultimately, lead to unhappiness. A list like this helps folks remember what's important... even when they're in a hormone rush.

And I'm quite sure that Dr. Warren would fight very hard to make sure that the Must Haves/Can't Stands list remains an integral part of the eHarmony process.

I respect his beliefs.

But, asking folks to share each other's lists?

In real life, did Dr. Warren actually encourage people to do this before they even met?

Don't get me wrong - intimate conversations should happen between couples. But they should take place when the attraction is established and comfort is present.

So, to tip our hats to Dr. Warren? Encourage folks to create their lists.

Remind them of their lists before the first date.

If eHarmony wanted to create guidance after the first date, they could encourage folks to exchange them after a few dates.

But, before the first date... sharing such a list creates antagonism.

And it can be a real attraction-killer.

I'll move on in tomorrow's article...

eHarmony's Biggest Flaw. (And how they can fix it.)

In my original blog, I've written a lot of advice on how guys can get better results from eHarmony.

And, although I've often been critical of some of their services, I've been pretty restrained in my criticism of the eHarmony system itself.

After all, my goal was to help guys do better on eHarmony. And telling folks that "Your failure is all eHarmony's fault" would prevent many guys from making changes that could lead to their happiness with the eHarmony service.

But, yes, I have one major criticism.

The problem is not the personality matching system. This is what makes eHarmony unique. And, in my experience, it does successfully narrow the field to folks that I stand a better chance of getting along with.

The problem is in what happens after the match is made. It's because eHarmony's guided communication system assumes that attraction is a left-brained activity, much like it's personality matching algorithm.

It's not.

As it stands, the guided communication process helps it's members come up with reasons to avoid meeting each other. Rather than helping it's members explore the commonalities that they may share.

And it encourages people to openly discuss topics that, in my opinion, can only be shared after a sense of attraction and basic comfort is established.

Bottom-line? It needs a major rewrite.

And, in my infinite generosity... I'll begin a draft of a new "Guided Communication System" in my next article.

Are geeks hot?

As I've often mentioned in eHarmony Cracked... I'm a a nerd.

I'm not socially inept, like the stereotypes... but, yes, when people get to know me, my varied and eccentric (and, some might say, geeky) interests will always come through to some degree.

And I've noticed an interesting thing.

A lot of women like it.

In fact, I've had some women privately confess (in the words of a former girlfriend's email), "You guys don't realize how hot that is."

And this has always fascinated me.

Taking my ego out of the game... yes, I suppose that it could be because I attract women who think that my latent geekiness is sexy. But I'm far from the only guy who's noticed this.

And it makes me wonder. Since the majority of eHarmony Cracked's readers were women, I wondered if some of the ladies out there would like to comment. Is "geek appeal" sexy to you? And, if so... what makes geeks sexy?

Is it the challenge of "discovering" a guy's closet nerdiness?

Of discovering new experiences?

The challenge of nurturing a man out of his bizarre little world?

The creativity these men can demonstrate in their relationships?

The feeling that they can be trusted not to stray?

I've heard all of these theories. And, in the end, I'm still not convinced.

So... ladies: Help me out. Can you explain it to me?